InfoBay AI Logo
Service

LLM Factuality Evaluation for Trustworthy AI

LLM factuality evaluation measures whether model outputs are accurate, grounded, complete, and safe for the intended domain. InfoBay builds expert-led evaluation loops that detect hallucinations, bias, weak reasoning, and unsafe responses before they reach production users.

Factuality is not a single score. Reliable evaluation needs domain-specific prompts, reference checks, reviewer calibration, error taxonomies, and feedback that can flow back into model improvement.

Multi-pass review

Layered checks for correctness, consistency, and safety.

Domain experts

Physicians, attorneys, researchers, engineers, and finance reviewers where needed.

Feedback loops

Findings can inform SFT, RLHF, red-teaming, and monitoring.

What Gets Evaluated

InfoBay evaluates responses for factual correctness, citation quality, domain fit, harmful bias, refusal behavior, and stability across prompt variations.

  • Hallucination and unsupported claim detection
  • Domain-specific accuracy scoring
  • Bias, safety, and refusal calibration

How Results Improve Models

Evaluation outputs are structured so model teams can identify failure patterns, prioritize fixes, and convert expert feedback into training or monitoring assets.

  • Error taxonomies
  • Reviewer rationales
  • Production monitoring datasets

Answers for buyers

FAQ

What is LLM factuality evaluation?

LLM factuality evaluation checks whether a model’s output is correct, grounded, complete, and safe for a specific use case or domain.

Can InfoBay evaluate regulated-domain AI?

Yes. InfoBay supports expert review workflows for healthcare, legal, finance, and other high-stakes domains.

Can evaluation data be used for fine-tuning?

Yes. Evaluation findings can be converted into SFT, RLHF, DPO, red-team, and monitoring datasets.